🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass gatherings where individuals of African heritage are compensated to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the accounts of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is celebrated is a reflection of the political moment. How it evolves is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration illustrates how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate events including Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the threats that affect everyone if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.