🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.